ArticleCureus2023
Two Surgeons' Technique for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Situs Inversus for a Right-Handed Surgeon: Technical and Ergonomic Considerations.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ergonomic modified port placement for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in situs inversus totalis: a case report and analysis of reported approaches.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Adaptability in the Midst of Anatomical Challenges: A Case of Situs Inversus Totalis in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be technically challenging in patients with situs inversus totalis. A middle-aged gentleman presented with pain in the left upper abdomen. His cardiac workup showed dextrocardia, and ultrasonography showed a gall bladder on the left side. He was diagnosed with acute cholecystitis and was planned for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We used the four-port technique, where anterior dissection was carried out by the dominant right hand of the primary surgeon, and the infundibulum was retracted by the first assistant from the mid-clavicular port. The first assistant carried out the posterior dissection through a midclavicular port, whereas the primary surgeon did a retraction. To conclude, this technique done by two surgeons decreases the ergonomic difficulty faced by right-handed surgeons while performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.