Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37252430›Full record

ArticleEvolution, medicine, and public health2023

Emotional factors, medical interventions and mode of birth among low-risk primiparous women in Poland.

Ilona Nenko, Katarzyna Kopeć-Godlewska, Mary C Towner, Laura D Klein, Agnieszka Micek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ilona NenkoDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7281-0286
Katarzyna Kopeć-GodlewskaLaboratory of Fundamental Obstetric Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Mary C TownerDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Laura D KleinBusiness Growth and Innovation, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Alexandria, Australia.
Agnieszka MicekDepartment of Nursing Management and Epidemiological Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PLAustralian Red Cross Lifeblood · AUOklahoma State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: Birth is a critical event in women's lives. Since humans have evolved to give birth in the context of social support, not having it in modern settings might lead to more complications during birth. Our aim was to model how emotional factors and medical interventions related to birth outcomes in hospital settings in Poland, where c-section rates have doubled in the last decade. Methodology: We analysed data from 2363 low-risk primiparous women who went into labor with the intention of giving birth vaginally. We used a model comparison approach to examine the relationship between emotional and medical variables and birth outcome (vaginal or c-section), including sociodemographic control variables in all models. Results: A model with emotional factors better explained the data than a control model (Δ Conclusions and implications: Continuous personal support during childbirth may be an evolutionarily informed strategy for reducing complications, including one of the most common obstetrical complications in modern hospital settings, the c-section.

Identifiers

PMID37252430
PMCPMC10224696
OpenAlexW4376506851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.