ArticleNew microbes and new infections2023
Enhancing infectious disease response: A demonstrative dialogue with ChatGPT and ChatGPT-4 for future outbreak preparedness.
Article in New microbes and new infections, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence enhanced infectious disease surveillance - A call for global collaboration.New microbes and new infections · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Examination of ChatGPT's Contribution to the Healthcare Sector and Hepatology.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Review
- Reference Hallucination Score for Medical Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: Development and Usability Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Feathered fears: Could avian H5N1 influenza be the next pandemic threat of disease X?New microbes and new infections · 2024Article
- ChatGPT in infectious diseases: A practical evaluation and future considerations.New microbes and new infections · 2023Article
- ChatGPT and the Future of Digital Health: A Study on Healthcare Workers' Perceptions and Expectations.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.