Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37252267›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2022

Using the biomarker cotinine and survey self-report to validate smoking data from United States Veterans Health Administration electronic health records.

Kathleen A McGinnis, Melissa Skanderson, Amy C Justice, Hilary A Tindle, Kathleen M Akgün, Aleksandra Wrona, Matthew S Freiberg, Matthew Bidwell Goetz, Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas, Sheldon T Brown and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Training a Smoking Status Probabilistic Model Using Cotinine Levels in a Large Claims Database.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kathleen A McGinnisVA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Melissa SkandersonVA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Amy C JusticeVA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0139-5502
Hilary A TindleDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Kathleen M AkgünDepartment of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Aleksandra WronaVA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Matthew S FreibergDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Matthew Bidwell GoetzVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Maria C Rodriguez-BarradasInfectious Diseases Section, Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VAMC, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sheldon T BrownJames J. Peterson VAMC, Bronx, New York, USA.
Kristina A CrothersDepartment of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Sex Disparities in Overall Response to ART Among HIV Infected IndividualsU24AA020794 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JUSTICE, AMY CAROLINE · 2011 to 2020
$5.5M
3/3 COMpAAAS Tripartite: ART-CC, KP, and VAU01AA026224 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JUSTICE, AMY CAROLINE · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA026224NIAAA NIH HHS U24 AA020794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Tobacco use/smoking for epidemiologic studies is often derived from electronic health record (EHR) data, which may be inaccurate. We previously compared smoking from the United States Veterans Health Administration (VHA) EHR clinical reminder data with survey data and found excellent agreement. However, the smoking clinical reminder items changed October 1, 2018. We sought to use the biomarker salivary cotinine (cotinine ≥30) to validate current smoking from multiple sources. Materials and Methods: We included 323 Veterans Aging Cohort Study participants with cotinine, clinical reminder, and self-administered survey smoking data from October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019. We included International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 codes F17.21 and Z72.0. Operating characteristics and kappa statistics were calculated. Results: Participants were mostly male (96%), African American (75%) and mean age was 63 years. Of those identified as currently smoking based on cotinine, 86%, 85%, and 51% were identified as currently smoking based on clinical reminder, survey, and ICD-10 codes, respectively. Of those identified as not currently smoking based on cotinine, 95%, 97%, and 97% were identified as not currently smoking based on clinical reminder, survey, and ICD-10 codes. Agreement with cotinine was substantial for clinical reminder (kappa = .81) and survey (kappa = .83), but only moderate for ICD-10 (kappa = .50). Discussion: To determine current smoking, clinical reminder, and survey agreed well with cotinine, whereas ICD-10 codes did not. Clinical reminders could be used in other health systems to capture more accurate smoking information. Conclusions: Clinical reminders are an excellent source for self-reported smoking status and are readily available in the VHA EHR.

Indexed as

cotinineelectronic health record (EHR)ICD-10self-reportedsmokingVeterans Health Administration

Identifiers

PMID37252267
PMCPMC9154288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.