ArticleThe journal of Tehran Heart Center2023
The Validity of Heart Rate Variability Obtained from Electrocardiography and Blood Pressure in Rats Subjected to Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Ischemia.
Article in The journal of Tehran Heart Center, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart rate variability (HRV) is calculated by electrocardiography (ECG-HRV) or blood pressure (BP-HRV). The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the above methods in rats with normal and ischemic hearts during the baroreflex maneuver. Methods: The study was conducted at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, in 2021. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into a sham group and an isoproterenol-mediated cardiac ischemia (ISO) group. Saline and isoproterenol (150 mg/kg) injected subcutaneously for 2 consecutive days in the sham and ISO groups, respectively. Then, the animals were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of sodium thiopental (60 mg/kg), and the femoral artery and vein were cannulated. Baroreflex was activated using an intravenous injection of phenylephrine (10 μg/100 μL saline). ECG, BP, and heart rate (HR) were recorded, and the time domain of HRV and baroreflex gain were calculated. Results: Baroreflex gain in the ISO group (male, weight=275.8±2.8 g, n=8) was lower than that in the sham group (male, weight=258±2.3 g, n=8) (P<0.05). ECG-HRV indicated an increase in the standard deviation of the RR interval (SDRR), the index of overall HRV, and the parasympathetic index of the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) in both groups. However, the rise in SDRR and RMSSD in the ISO group was less than that in the sham group (P<0.05). SDRR and RMSSD obtained from BP did not show a difference between the sham and ISO groups, nor did they correspond with the results seen in baroreflex gain. Conclusion: BP-HRV was not as valuable as ECG-HRV in assessing cardiac ischemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.