Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37252075›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2023

Supporting breastfeeding equity: A cross-sectional study of US birthing facility administrators.

Sarah Gonzalez-Nahm, Sara E Benjamin-Neelon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Gonzalez-NahmDepartment of Nutrition, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Sara E Benjamin-NeelonDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disparities in breastfeeding have continued in the United States (US) despite efforts to increase breastfeeding rates. Hospitals are in a unique position to enable breastfeeding and help reduce disparities; however, it is unclear whether hospital administration is supportive of breastfeeding equity practices or plans. This study aimed to assess birthing facility plans to support breastfeeding among women of low income and women of color across the US. We administered electronic surveys to 283 US hospital administrators between 2019 and 2020. We assessed whether facilities had a plan in place to support breastfeeding among women of low income and women of color. We assessed associations between Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) status and having a plan in place. We examined reported activities provided through open-ended responses. Fifty-four percent of facilities had a plan in place to support breastfeeding among women of low income and 9% had a plan in place to support breastfeeding among women of color. Having a plan was not associated with having a BFHI designation. A lack of plan to specifically help those with the lowest rates of breastfeeding may perpetuate rather than reduce inequities. Providing anti-racism and health equity training to healthcare administrators may help birthing facilities achieve breastfeeding equity.

Indexed as

BreastfeedingEquityHealthcare servicesLow incomeRacial bias

Identifiers

PMID37252075
PMCPMC10220392
OpenAlexW4377691724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.