Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37252026›Full record

ReviewResuscitation plus2023

Prehospital transport and termination of resuscitation of cardiac arrest patients: A review of prehospital care protocols in the United States.

Timmy Li, Daniel Koloden, Jonathan Berkowitz, Dee Luo, Howard Luan, Charles Gilley, Gregory Kurgansky, Paul Barbara

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Resuscitation plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Determining Access for a City-Wide Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) Initiative Using Geospatial Analysis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Timmy LiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Daniel KolodenCenter for Emergency Medical Services, Northwell Health, 15 Burke Lane, Syosset, NY, USA.
Jonathan BerkowitzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Dee LuoDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 500 Hofstra Blvd, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Howard LuanFeinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Charles GilleyFeinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Gregory KurganskyFeinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Paul BarbaraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell · USNorthwell Health · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The objective was to describe emergency medical services (EMS) protocol variability in transport expectations for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients and the involvement of online medical control for on-scene termination of resuscitation in the United States. Whether other aspects of OHCA care were mentioned, including the definition of a "pediatric" patient, and use of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, mechanical chest compression devices (MCCDs), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), were also described. Methods and Results: Review of EMS protocols publicly accessible from https://www.emsprotocols.org and through searches on the internet when protocols were unavailable on the website from June 2021 to January 2022. Frequencies and proportions were used to describe outcomes. Of 104 protocols reviewed, 51.9% state to initiate transport after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 26.0% do not specify when to initiate transport, and 6.7% state to transport after ≥20 minutes of on-scene cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adults. For pediatric patients, 38.5% of protocols do not specify when to initiate transport, 32.7% state to transport after ROSC, and 10.6% state to transport as soon as possible. Most protocols (42.3%) did not specify the age that defines "pediatric" in cardiac arrest. More than half (51.9%) of the protocols require online medical control for termination of resuscitation. Most protocols mention the use of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring (81.7%), 50.0% mention the use of MCCDs, and 4.8% mention ECMO for cardiac arrest. Conclusions: In the United States, EMS protocols for initiation of transport and termination of resuscitation for OHCA patients are highly variable.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestEmergency medical servicesProtocolsResuscitationVariability

Identifiers

PMID37252026
PMCPMC10213088
OpenAlexW4377038134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.