ReviewResuscitation plus2023
Prehospital transport and termination of resuscitation of cardiac arrest patients: A review of prehospital care protocols in the United States.
Review in Resuscitation plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determining Access for a City-Wide Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) Initiative Using Geospatial Analysis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- Disparities in Emergency Medical Services Intra-Arrest Transport by Neighborhood Socioeconomic Vulnerability.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Overdose-Related Cardiac Arrest in the Era of the Opioid Epidemic.Critical care clinics · 2026Review
- Comparison of return of spontaneous circulation prediction scores in patients with cardiac arrest during ambulance transport.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest at Centers With and Without On-Site Coronary Angiography: A Nationwide Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Explaining the experience of telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Kermanshah emergency medical dispatch: A qualitative, phenomenological study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Derivation of a clinical decision rule for termination of resuscitation in non-traumatic pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2024Article
- Survival After Intra-Arrest Transport vs On-Scene Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Children.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Variability of Prehospital Pain Management Protocols: A Review of Prehospital Care Protocols in the United States.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2024Review
- Clinical Research in Prehospital Care: Current and Future Challenges.Clinics and practice · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The objective was to describe emergency medical services (EMS) protocol variability in transport expectations for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients and the involvement of online medical control for on-scene termination of resuscitation in the United States. Whether other aspects of OHCA care were mentioned, including the definition of a "pediatric" patient, and use of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, mechanical chest compression devices (MCCDs), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), were also described. Methods and Results: Review of EMS protocols publicly accessible from https://www.emsprotocols.org and through searches on the internet when protocols were unavailable on the website from June 2021 to January 2022. Frequencies and proportions were used to describe outcomes. Of 104 protocols reviewed, 51.9% state to initiate transport after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 26.0% do not specify when to initiate transport, and 6.7% state to transport after ≥20 minutes of on-scene cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adults. For pediatric patients, 38.5% of protocols do not specify when to initiate transport, 32.7% state to transport after ROSC, and 10.6% state to transport as soon as possible. Most protocols (42.3%) did not specify the age that defines "pediatric" in cardiac arrest. More than half (51.9%) of the protocols require online medical control for termination of resuscitation. Most protocols mention the use of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring (81.7%), 50.0% mention the use of MCCDs, and 4.8% mention ECMO for cardiac arrest. Conclusions: In the United States, EMS protocols for initiation of transport and termination of resuscitation for OHCA patients are highly variable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.