Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37252025›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2023

Specific thresholds of quantitative pupillometry parameters predict unfavorable outcome in comatose survivors early after cardiac arrest.

Benjamin Nyholm, Laust Emil Roelsgaard Obling, Christian Hassager, Johannes Grand, Jacob Eifer Møller, Marwan H Othman, Daniel Kondziella, Jesper Kjaergaard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin NyholmDepartment of Cardiology, the Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Laust Emil Roelsgaard OblingDepartment of Cardiology, the Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian HassagerDepartment of Cardiology, the Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Johannes GrandDepartment of Cardiology, the Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacob Eifer MøllerDepartment of Cardiology, the Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marwan H OthmanDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Daniel KondziellaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper KjaergaardDepartment of Cardiology, the Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Quantitative pupillometry is the guideline-recommended method for assessing pupillary light reflex for multimodal prognostication in comatose patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, threshold values predicting an unfavorable outcome have been inconsistent across studies; therefore, we aimed to identify specific thresholds for all quantitative pupillometry parameters. Methods: Comatose post-OHCA patients were consecutively admitted to the cardiac arrest center at Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet from April 2015 to June 2017. The parameters of quantitatively assessed pupillary light reflex (qPLR), Neurological Pupil index (NPi), average/max constriction velocity (CV/MCV), dilation velocity (DV), and latency of constriction (Lat) were recorded on the first three days after admission. We evaluated the prognostic performance and identified thresholds achieving zero percent false positive rate (0% PFR) for an unfavorable outcome of 90-day Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 3-5. Treating physicians were blinded for pupillometry results. Results: Of the 135 post-OHCA patients, the primary outcome occurred for 53 (39%) patients.On any day during hospitalization, a qPLR < 4%, NPi < 2.45, CV < 0.1 mm/s, and an MCV < 0.335 mm/s predicted 90-day unfavorable neurological outcome with 0% FPR (95%CI: 0-0%), with sensitivities of 28% (17-40%), 9% (2-19%), 13% (6-23%), and 17% (8-26%), respectively on day 1. Conclusion: We found that specific thresholds of all quantitative pupillometry parameters, measured at any time following hospital admission until day 3, predicted a 90-day unfavorable outcome with 0% FPR in comatose patients resuscitated from OHCA. However, at 0% FPR, thresholds resulted in low sensitivity. These findings should be further validated in larger multicenter clinical trials.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestPost resuscitation carePrognosticationPupillometry

Identifiers

PMID37252025
PMCPMC10220278
OpenAlexW4377966281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.