ArticleSaudi journal of medicine & medical sciences
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Enteral Feeding Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients and the Effectiveness of Preventive Treatments: A Prospective Study.
Article in Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends and development in perioperative enteral nutrition: a systematic bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Pooled it
- Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Early Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in ICU Patients Using Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Selected Gut Microbial Taxa.Polish journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- Risk stratification of postoperative enteral feeding intolerance using explainable machine learning in oral cancer free flap reconstruction.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Electroacupuncture for the prevention of acute gastrointestinal injury in patients with sepsis undergoing mechanical ventilation (EAGISM): a protocol for an open-label randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Risk prediction models for enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients: an overview of systematic reviews.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Risk Factors of Enternal Nutrition Intolerance in Septic Patients: A Case-control Study.Current medical science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Feeding intolerance (FI) is a prevalent cause of enteral nutrition (EN) disruption. Factors that can prevent FI are poorly described. Objectives: To determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with FI in critically ill patients and the effectiveness of preventive treatments. Patients and Methods: This prospective observational study included critically ill patients admitted to the ICU of a general hospital who received EN through a nasogastric or nasointestinal tube from March 2020 to October 2021. Independent sample Results: The study included 200 critically ill patients (mean age: 59.1 ± 17.8 years), of whom 131 were male. Most patients (58.50%) developed FI after a median EN duration of 2 days. The independent risk factors for FI were fasting for >3 days, high APACHE II score, and acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grade I before EN ( Conclusion: In ICU patients receiving nasogastric or nasointestinal tube feeding, FI was frequent, occurred early, and was more frequent in patients with fasting >3 days, a high APACHE II score, and an AGI grade before EN. Preventive treatments can reduce FI prevalence and result in patients consuming more nutrient solutions and having shorter invasive mechanical ventilation duration. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Registration no: ChiCTR-DOD-16008532.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.