ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2023
The impact of interactive clinically-based learning on the performance of medical students in radiology.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving membranous urethral length measurements on prostate MRI: a comparison of online training methods.European radiology · 2026Article
- Team-based learning versus lecture-based instruction for chest radiograph interpretation in physician associate education: a quasi-experimental study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Students' perspective on new teaching concepts for medical studies: case- and competency-based learning in radiology.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of changing the teaching method in the radiology course at a medical school from lecture-based learning to clinically case-based learning using interactive methods, with the aim to improve undergraduate radiology education and students' diagnostic abilities. Methods: During the 2018-2019 academic year, we compared the achievements of medical students in the radiology course. Teaching in the first year was primarily conducted through conventional lectures (traditional course; TC), while in the following year, a case-based teaching approach along with an interactive web application called "Nearpod" (clinically-oriented course; COC) was employed to motivate student participation. The student knowledge assessments were composed of identical post-test questions, which included five images of common diagnoses. The results were compared using Pearson's Chi-Square test or Fisher Exact Test. Results: There were 72 students who answered the post-test in the first year and 55 students responded in the second year. Post-test student achievements following the methodological changes were significantly higher as compared with the control group in the total grade (65.1 ± 21.5 vs. 40.8 ± 19.1, p < 0.001). An improvement in the identification rates of all assessed cases was noticed, with the most prominent improvement in pneumothorax recognition (4.2% vs. 61.8%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Teaching radiology using clinical case-based teaching methods combined with web-based interactive applications like Nearpod results in significant improvements in identifying key imaging pathologies when compared to traditional teaching methods. This approach has the potential to enhance radiology learning and better prepare students for their future roles as clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.