Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37251945›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in the elderly patient: a multicenter retrospective matched-cohort study.

Giovanni Capovilla, Eren Uzun, Alessia Scarton, Lucia Moletta, Edin Hadzijusufovic, Luca Provenzano, Renato Salvador, Elisa Sefora Pierobon, Gianpietro Zanchettin, Evangelos Tagkalos and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni CapovillaDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy.
Eren UzunDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Alessia ScartonDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy.
Lucia MolettaDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy.
Edin HadzijusufovicDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Luca ProvenzanoDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy.
Renato SalvadorDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy.
Elisa Sefora PierobonDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy.
Gianpietro ZanchettinDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy.
Evangelos TagkalosDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Felix BerlthDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Hauke LangDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Michele ValmasoniDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy.
Peter P GrimmingerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
University of Padua · ITUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Several studies reported the advantages of minimally invasive esophagectomy over the conventional open approach, particularly in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The literature regarding the elderly population is however scarce and it is still not clear whether elderly patients may benefit from a minimally invasive approach as the general population. We sought to evaluate whether thoracoscopic/ laparoscopic (MIE) or fully robotic (RAMIE) Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy significantly reduces postoperative morbidity in the elderly population. Methods: We analyzed data of patients who underwent open esophagectomy or MIE/RAMIE at Mainz University Hospital and at Padova University Hospital between 2016 and 2021. Elderly patients were defined as those ≥ 75 years old. Clinical characteristics and the postoperative outcomes were compared between elderly patients who underwent open esophagectomy or MIE/RAMIE. A 1-to-1 matched comparison was also performed. Patients < 75 years old were evaluated as a control group. Results: Among elderly patients MIE/RAMIE were associated with a lower overall morbidity (39.7% vs. 62.7%, p=0.005), less pulmonary complications (32.8 vs. 56.9%, p=0.003) and a shorter hospital stay (13 vs. 18 days, p=0.03). Comparable findings were obtained after matching. Similarly, among < 75 years-old patients, a reduced morbidity (31.2% vs. 43.5%, p=0.01) and less pulmonary complications (22% vs. 36%, p=0.001) were detected in the minimally invasive group. Discussion: Minimally invasive esophagectomy improves the postoperative course of elderly patients reducing the overall incidence of postoperative complications, particularly of pulmonary complications.

Indexed as

esophageal canceresophagectomylaparoscopyMIERAMIEthoracoscopy

Identifiers

PMID37251945
PMCPMC10213659
OpenAlexW4378746555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.