ArticleHeliyon2023
Automated identification of single and clustered chromosomes for metaphase image analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated karyogram analysis for early detection of genetic and neurodegenerative disorders: a hybrid machine learning approach.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chromosome analysis is laborious and time-consuming. Automated methods can significantly increase the efficiency of chromosome analysis. For the automated analysis of chromosome images, single and clustered chromosomes must be identified. Herein, we propose a feature-based method for distinguishing between single chromosomes and clustered chromosome. Method: The proposed method comprises three main steps. In the first step, chromosome objects are segmented from metaphase chromosome images in advance. In the second step, seven features are extracted from each segmented object, i.e., the normalized area, area/boundary ratio, side branch index, exhaustive thresholding index, normalized minimum width, minimum concave angle, and maximum boundary shift. Finally, the segmented objects are classified as a single chromosome or chromosome cluster using a combination of the seven features. Results: In total, 43,391 segmented objects, including 39,892 single chromosomes and 3,499 chromosome clusters, are used to evaluate the proposed method. The results show that the proposed method achieves an accuracy of 98.92% by combining the seven features using support vector machine. Conclusions: The proposed method is highly effective in distinguishing between single and clustered chromosomes and can be used as a preprocessing procedure for automated chromosome image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.