Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37251724›Full record

ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2023

Periodontal tissue changes after crown lengthening surgery: A systematic review and

Samantha C Smith, Rayner Goh, Sunyoung Ma, Getulio R Nogueira, Momen Atieh, Andrew Tawse-Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samantha C SmithSir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Rayner GohSir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Sunyoung MaSir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Getulio R NogueiraSir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Momen AtiehSir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Andrew Tawse-SmithSir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Crown lengthening is one of the most common periodontal surgical procedures carried out to increase the amount of supragingival tooth structure. There is a lot of literature on crown lengthening surgeries, but very few systematic reviews comparing treated and adjacent sites over a six-month period. The purpose of this systematic review and Methods: Electronic databases were searched up to 28 February 2022 with no restriction on publication status. A manual search of journals was also performed. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select the relevant articles that assessed dimensional changes in periodontal tissues after crown lengthening surgery. The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI critical appraisal checklist. Data Results: A total of 78 studies were identified, of which, four clinical controlled trials containing 182 crown lengthening surgical procedures across 111 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant changes after three or six months in terms of supracrestal tissue attachment levels, bone level and probing pocket depth between treated and adjacent sites. However, clinical attachment level changes were statistically significant, favouring adjacent teeth at six months. Conclusions: Within the limitation of this systematic review, crown lengthening surgery results in stable periodontal tissues over time according to the acceptable periodontal healing parameters. Further evidence is still required to substantiate these findings.

Indexed as

Crown lengtheningPeriodontiumSystematic reviewWound healing

Identifiers

PMID37251724
PMCPMC10213835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.