ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2023
Assessing the construct validity of musculoskeletal ultrasound and the rheumatoid arthritis foot disease activity index (RADAI-F5) for managing rheumatoid foot disease.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Foot Orthoses and Footwear in People with Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Updated Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Causal associations between gut microbiota and synovitis-tenosynovitis: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The RA foot disease activity index (RADAI-F5) is a valid, reliable and clinically feasible patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for the measurement of RA foot disease activity. Further validation of the RADAI-F5 against musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) for foot disease activity is necessary before clinical implementation. The aim of this study was to examine the construct validity of the RADAI-F5 in relationship to MSUS and clinical examination. Methods: Participants with RA completed the RADAI-F5. MSUS was used to evaluate disease activity (synovial hypertrophy/synovitis/tenosynovitis/bursitis) and joint damage (erosion) using greyscale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) at 16 regions in each foot, including joints and soft tissues. These same regions were examined clinically for swelling and tenderness. The construct validity of the RADAI-F5 was assessed using correlation coefficients and a priori Results: Of 60 participants, 48 were female, with a mean (s.d.) age of 62.6 (9.96) years and median disease duration of 15.49 (interquartile range 6-20.5) years. Theoretically consistent associations confirming construct validity [95% CI] were observed between the RADAI-F5 and MSUS GS (0.76 [0.57, 0.82]; strong), MSUS PD (0.55 [0.35, 0.71]; moderate), MSUS-detected erosions (0.41 [0.18, 0.61]; moderate), clinical tenderness (0.52 [0.31, 0.68]; moderate) and clinical swelling (0.36 [0.13, 0.55]; weak). Conclusion: Moderate to strong correlations between RADAI-F5 and MSUS demonstrate the good measurement properties of this instrument. With greater confidence in the utility of the RADAI-F5, clinical use of this new instrument as an adjunct to the disease activity score for 28 joints (DAS-28) could help to identify RA patients at risk for poor functional and radiological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.