Article in PhytoKeys, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Daozhang MinState Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China Jiangxi Agricultural University Nanchang China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8779-5592
Wei ShiState Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China Jiangxi Agricultural University Nanchang China.
Mohammad Mehdi DehshiriDepartment of Biology, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, Iran Islamic Azad University Borujerd Iran.
Yuting GouResearch Centre of Ecological Sciences, College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences Urumqi China.
Wei LiInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Kaixuan ZhangInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Meiliang ZhouInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Bo LiResearch Centre of Ecological Sciences, College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences Urumqi China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1628-8128
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
In the context of the molecular phylogeny of Polygonaceae, the phylogenetic positions of most genera and their relationships have been resolved. However, the monotypic genus
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The molecular phylogenetic position of · full record | OpenQuestion