Endorsement of scientific inquiry promotes better evaluation of climate policy evidence.

Jessica E Hughes, James D Sauer, Aaron Drummond, Laura E Brumby, Matthew A Palmer

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Climatic change, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica E HughesPresent Address: School of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1709-4926

James D SauerPresent Address: School of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.

Aaron DrummondSchool of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Laura E BrumbyPresent Address: School of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.

Matthew A PalmerPresent Address: School of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public and scientific consensus about climate change do not align. Problematically, higher scientific knowledge has been associated with lower acceptance of climate information among those with more conservative socio-political ideologies. Positive attitudes towards science can attenuate this effect. We investigated the association between Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10584-023-03535-y.

Indexed as

Attitudes towards scienceClimate change policyDecision-makingDeficit modelMotivated reasoningScientific inquiryScientific literacy

Identifiers

PMID37251553

DOI10.1007/s10584-023-03535-y

PMCPMC10197046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.