Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37251530›Full record

ReviewWiener klinisches Magazin : Beilage zur Wiener klinischen Wochenschrift2023

[Surgery of old people-Thoracic surgery].

Jonas Peter Ehrsam, Clemens Aigner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener klinisches Magazin : Beilage zur Wiener klinischen Wochenschrift, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonas Peter EhrsamAbteilung Thoraxchirurgie und thorakale Endoskopie, Ruhrlandklinik, Tüschener Weg 40, 45239 Essen, Deutschland.
Clemens AignerAbteilung für Thoraxchirurgie, Klinik Floridsdorf, Wien, Österreich.
Ruhrlandklinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence of a large number of diseases relevant to thoracic surgery increases with age; however, old age is still frequently considered a contraindication per se for curative interventions and extensive surgical procedures. Objective: Overview of the current relevant literature, derivation of recommendations for patient selection as well as preoperative, perioperative and postoperative optimization. Material and methods: Analysis of the current study situation. Results: Recent data show that for most thoracic diseases, age alone is not a reason to withhold surgical treatment. Much more important for the selection are comorbidities, frailty, malnutrition and cognitive impairment. A lobectomy or segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in carefully selected octogenarians can provide acceptable to even comparably good short-term and long-term results as in younger patients. Selected > 75-year-old patients with stages II-IIIA NSCLC even benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. With appropriate selection high-risk interventions, such as pneumonectomy in > 70-year-old patients and pulmonary endarterectomy in > 80-year-old patients can be performed without an increase in mortality rates. Even lung transplantation can lead to good long-term results in carefully selected > 70-year-old patients. Minimally invasive surgical techniques and nonintubated anesthesia contribute to risk reduction in marginal patients. Discussion: In thoracic surgery the biological age rather than the chronological age is decisive. In view of the increasingly older population, further studies are urgently needed to optimize patient selection, type of intervention, preoperative planning and postoperative treatment as well as the quality of life.

Indexed as

AgeLung surgeryLung transplantationNon-small cell lung cancerThoracic disease

Identifiers

PMID37251530
PMCPMC10126566
OpenAlexW4366987340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.