Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37251528›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of peptide research and therapeutics2023

Strategic Approaches to Improvise Peptide Drugs as Next Generation Therapeutics.

Panchali Barman, Shubhi Joshi, Sheetal Sharma, Simran Preet, Shweta Sharma, Avneet Saini

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of peptide research and therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Late-Stage Functionalization of Peptides on the Solid Phase.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Beyond Efficacy: Ensuring Safety in Peptide Therapeutics through Immunogenicity Assessment.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Panchali BarmanInstitute of Forensic Science and Criminology (UIEAST), Panjab University, Sector 14, Chandigarh, 160014 India.
Shubhi JoshiEnergy Research Centre, Panjab University, Sector 14, Chandigarh, 160014 India.
Sheetal SharmaDepartment of Biophysics, Panjab University, Sector 25, Chandigarh, U.T 160014 India.
Simran PreetDepartment of Biophysics, Panjab University, Sector 25, Chandigarh, U.T 160014 India.
Shweta SharmaInstitute of Forensic Science and Criminology (UIEAST), Panjab University, Sector 14, Chandigarh, 160014 India.
Avneet SainiDepartment of Biophysics, Panjab University, Sector 25, Chandigarh, U.T 160014 India.ORCID 0000-0002-1101-8623
Panjab University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the occurrence of a wide variety of drug-resistant diseases has led to an increase in interest in alternate therapies. Peptide-based drugs as an alternate therapy hold researchers' attention in various therapeutic fields such as neurology, dermatology, oncology, metabolic diseases, etc. Previously, they had been overlooked by pharmaceutical companies due to certain limitations such as proteolytic degradation, poor membrane permeability, low oral bioavailability, shorter half-life, and poor target specificity. Over the last two decades, these limitations have been countered by introducing various modification strategies such as backbone and side-chain modifications, amino acid substitution, etc. which improve their functionality. This has led to a substantial interest of researchers and pharmaceutical companies, moving the next generation of these therapeutics from fundamental research to the market. Various chemical and computational approaches are aiding the production of more stable and long-lasting peptides guiding the formulation of novel and advanced therapeutic agents. However, there is not a single article that talks about various peptide design approaches i.e., in-silico and in-vitro along with their applications and strategies to improve their efficacy. In this review, we try to bring different aspects of peptide-based therapeutics under one article with a clear focus to cover the missing links in the literature. This review draws emphasis on various in-silico approaches and modification-based peptide design strategies. It also highlights the recent progress made in peptide delivery methods important for their enhanced clinical efficacy. The article would provide a bird's-eye view to researchers aiming to develop peptides with therapeutic applications. Graphical Abstract:

Indexed as

Computational strategiesModificationsPeptide-based drug deliveryPeptide therapeutics

Identifiers

PMID37251528
PMCPMC10206374
OpenAlexW4377942021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.