Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37251352›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2023

Point cloud completion in challenging indoor scenarios with human motion.

Chengsi Zhang, Stephen Czarnuch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chengsi ZhangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Stephen CzarnuchDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science and the Discipline of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining and completing point cloud data from two or more sensors with arbitrarily relative perspectives in a dynamic, cluttered, and complex environment is challenging, especially when the two sensors have significant perspective differences while the large overlap ratio and feature-rich scene cannot be guaranteed. We create a novel approach targeting this challenging scenario by registering two camera captures in a time series with unknown perspectives and human movements to easily use our system in a real-life scene. In our approach, we first reduce the six unknowns of 3D point cloud completion to three by aligning the ground planes found by our previous perspective-independent 3D ground plane estimation algorithm. Subsequently, we use a histogram-based approach to identify and extract all the humans from each frame generating a three-dimensional (3D) human walking sequence in a time series. To enhance accuracy and performance, we convert 3D human walking sequences to lines by calculating the center of mass (CoM) point of each human body and connecting them. Finally, we match the walking paths in different data trials by minimizing the Fréchet distance between two walking paths and using 2D iterative closest point (ICP) to find the remaining three unknowns in the overall transformation matrix for the final alignment. Using this approach, we can successfully register the corresponding walking path of the human between the two cameras' captures and estimate the transformation matrix between the two sensors.

Indexed as

3D completion3D data analysis3D data processingpoint cloud registrationpoint cloud segmentation

Identifiers

PMID37251352
PMCPMC10209708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.