ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Diagnostic potential of routine brain MRI and high-resolution, multi-contrast vessel wall imaging in the detection of internal carotid artery dissection.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification and scoring of factors for ischemic stroke related to cervical arterial dissection: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Imaging suspected posterior circulation stroke in the emergency department: a practical modality-based review.Emergency radiology · 2026Review
- Initial magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography may miss intracranial artery dissection in young adults with stroke: the role of subsequent imaging.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- Craniocervical arterial dissections with cerebral infarction: a five-case series with diagnostic application of vessel wall MRI.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is one of the major causes of stroke and most commonly occurs at the site of the extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA). This study aimed to assess the value of routine brain MRI, clinical information, and high-resolution, multi-contrast vessel wall MR imaging (hrVWI) for the timely detection of ICA dissection. Methods: A total of 105 patients with CAD and 105 without CAD were recruited for this study. The lesion type in the patients was determined based on images from different modalities, including brain MRI, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), ultrasonography, and hrVWI and clinical information. Each lesion was reviewed to determine the type following a stepwise procedure by referring to (1) brain MRI only; (2) brain MRI and clinical information; (3) hrVWI only; and (4) hrVWI, CTA, DSA, and clinical information. Results: Typical clinical presentations of patients with potential CAD include headache, neck pain, and/or Horner's syndrome. Representative imaging signs in the brain MRI included a crescentic or circular iso- or hyperintensity around the lumen, a curvilinear and isointense line crossing the lumen, or aneurysmal vessel dilation. Based on brain MRI alone, 54.3% (57/105) of the patients with CAD were correctly classified, and the accuracy increased to 73.3% (77/105) when clinical information was combined ( Conclusion: The combination of brain MRI and clinical information could be used for the diagnosis of CAD; however, hrVWI should be sought for uncertain cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.