Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37251191›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Extracting Chemical Information from Scientific Literature Using Text Mining: Building an Ionic Conductivity Database for Solid-State Electrolytes.

Yea-Jin Shon, Kyoungmin Min

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yea-Jin ShonSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Soongsil University, 369 Sangdo-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea.
Kyoungmin MinSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Soongsil University, 369 Sangdo-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-6005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, as the demand for electric vehicles has rapidly grown, concerns regarding the safety of liquid electrolytes used as battery materials have increased. Rechargeable batteries made of liquid electrolytes pose a risk of fire and may explode due to the decomposition reaction of the electrolyte. Accordingly, interest in solid-state electrolytes (SSEs), which have greater stability than liquid electrolytes, is increasing, and research into finding stable SSEs with high ionic conductivity is actively being conducted. Consequently, it is essential to obtain a large amount of material data to explore new SSEs. However, the data collection process is highly repetitive and time-consuming. Therefore, the goal of this study is to automatically extract the ionic conductivities of SSEs from published literature using text-mining algorithms and use this information to construct a materials database. The extraction procedure includes document processing, natural language preprocessing, phase parsing, relation extraction, and data post-processing. For performance verification, the ionic conductivities are extracted from 38 studies, and the accuracy of the proposed model is confirmed by comparing extracted conductivities with the actual ones. In previous research, 93% of battery-related records were unable to distinguish between ionic and electrical conductivities. However, by applying the proposed model, the proportion of undistinguished records was successfully reduced from 93 to 24.3%. Finally, the ionic conductivity database was constructed by extracting the ionic conductivity from 3258 papers, and the battery database was reconstructed by adding eight pieces of representative structural information.

Identifiers

PMID37251191
PMCPMC10210167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.