ArticleACS omega2023
Extracting Chemical Information from Scientific Literature Using Text Mining: Building an Ionic Conductivity Database for Solid-State Electrolytes.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Covalent Organic Framework Electrolytes for Solid-State Lithium Batteries: Designing Ion Highways for Next-Generation Energy Storage.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Librarian of Alexandria: A Modular Chemical Data Extraction Pipeline to Compare LLM Performance.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Advancing battery research through large language models: A review.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, as the demand for electric vehicles has rapidly grown, concerns regarding the safety of liquid electrolytes used as battery materials have increased. Rechargeable batteries made of liquid electrolytes pose a risk of fire and may explode due to the decomposition reaction of the electrolyte. Accordingly, interest in solid-state electrolytes (SSEs), which have greater stability than liquid electrolytes, is increasing, and research into finding stable SSEs with high ionic conductivity is actively being conducted. Consequently, it is essential to obtain a large amount of material data to explore new SSEs. However, the data collection process is highly repetitive and time-consuming. Therefore, the goal of this study is to automatically extract the ionic conductivities of SSEs from published literature using text-mining algorithms and use this information to construct a materials database. The extraction procedure includes document processing, natural language preprocessing, phase parsing, relation extraction, and data post-processing. For performance verification, the ionic conductivities are extracted from 38 studies, and the accuracy of the proposed model is confirmed by comparing extracted conductivities with the actual ones. In previous research, 93% of battery-related records were unable to distinguish between ionic and electrical conductivities. However, by applying the proposed model, the proportion of undistinguished records was successfully reduced from 93 to 24.3%. Finally, the ionic conductivity database was constructed by extracting the ionic conductivity from 3258 papers, and the battery database was reconstructed by adding eight pieces of representative structural information.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.