Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37251011›Full record

ArticleInternational cancer conference journal2023

A case of solitary lymph node recurrence 9 years after initial treatment for advanced premenopausal endometrioid endometrial cancer; clinical usefulness of hormonal replacement therapy.

Maaya Ono, Koji Yamanoi, Asuka Okunomiya, Yusuke Sagae, Haruko Okamoto, Masumi Sunada, Mana Taki, Masayo Ukita, Yoshitsugu Chigusa, Akihito Horie and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International cancer conference journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maaya OnoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan.
Koji YamanoiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1240-5422
Asuka OkunomiyaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan.
Yusuke SagaeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan.
Haruko OkamotoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan.
Masumi SunadaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan.
Mana TakiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan.
Masayo UkitaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan.
Yoshitsugu ChigusaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan.
Akihito HorieDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan.
Ken YamaguchiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan.
Junzo HamanishiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan.
Masaki MandaiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan.
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no consensus on the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after treatment of advanced corpus cancer. We report a case of advanced corpus cancer at a young age, in which HRT was initiated 7 years after surgery, and regional lymph node recurrence was later detected. The patient was 35 years old at the time of initial treatment in X year, when she was diagnosed with stageIIIC2 corpus cancer and underwent a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and a retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. HRT was started at X + 7 years, and at X + 9 years, a 25 × 12-mm-sized mass was found in the hilum of the right kidney. A laparoscopic resection revealed regional lymph node recurrence of the corpus cancer. A retrospective study further revealed that a tumor measuring 12 × 3 mm was found at X + 3 years and grew to 18 × 7 mm in X + 6 years, just before the start of the HRT. We hypothesize that HRT did not induce tumor recurrence; instead, it allowed for long-term follow-up and early diagnosis.

Indexed as

Advanced corpus cancerHormone replacement therapyLate recurrence

Identifiers

PMID37251011
PMCPMC10212858
OpenAlexW4323858382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.