Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37250997›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2023

Lessons learned: Development of COVID-19 clinical staging models at a large urban research institution.

Sean S Huang, Lelia H Chaisson, William Galanter, Arash Jalali, Martha Menchaca, Natalie Parde, Jorge M Rodríguez-Fernández, Andrew Trotter, Karl M Kochendorfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sean S HuangDepartment of Medicine, Division of Academic Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5050-2012
Lelia H ChaissonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6103-9089
William GalanterDepartment of Medicine, Division of Academic Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7811-5391
Arash JalaliSchool of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Martha MenchacaDepartment of Radiology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5569-9961
Natalie PardeDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0072-7499
Jorge M Rodríguez-FernándezDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4888-2041
Andrew TrotterDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7069-2979
Karl M KochendorferDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6030-5357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Objective: The University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC), along with many academic institutions worldwide, made significant efforts to address the many challenges presented during the COVID-19 pandemic by developing clinical staging and predictive models. Data from patients with a clinical encounter at UIC from July 1, 2019 to March 30, 2022 were abstracted from the electronic health record and stored in the UIC Center for Clinical and Translational Science Clinical Research Data Warehouse, prior to data analysis. While we saw some success, there were many failures along the way. For this paper, we wanted to discuss some of these obstacles and many of the lessons learned from the journey. Methods: Principle investigators, research staff, and other project team members were invited to complete an anonymous Qualtrics survey to reflect on the project. The survey included open-ended questions centering on participants' opinions about the project, including whether project goals were met, project successes, project failures, and areas that could have been improved. We then identified themes among the results. Results: Nine project team members (out of 30 members contacted) completed the survey. The responders were anonymous. The survey responses were grouped into four key themes: Collaboration, Infrastructure, Data Acquisition/Validation, and Model Building. Conclusion: Through our COVID-19 research efforts, the team learned about our strengths and deficiencies. We continue to work to improve our research and data translation capabilities.

Indexed as

collaborationCOVID-19data acquisitiondata infrastructuredata validationinformation systemsLessons learnedpredictive modelstranslation

Identifiers

PMID37250997
PMCPMC10225257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.