ReviewHepatology forum2023
Does mtori base immunosuppression offer survival advantage after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Hepatology forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of machine perfusion in preventing recurrence after liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Renal metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma after living donor liver transplantation.IJU case reports · 2025Article
- Everolimus Mitigates the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Liver Transplantation.Cancers · 2024Article
- mTOR inhibitor reduces nontumour-related death in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.Molecular biomedicine · 2024Article
- 2023 Update of Indian National Association for Study of the Liver Consensus on Management of Intermediate and Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Puri III Recommendations.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrence is still a problem after liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing tumor recurrence of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) versus Calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression after liver transplantation for HCC. A systematic search was conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials databases. The Medical Subject Headings used in the search included: "sirolimus," "everolimus," "mTORi," "HCC," "mTORi," "hepatic transplantation" "randomized controlled trials," and "liver transplantation (LT)". Seven randomized controlled trials were included for meta-analysis. There were a total of 1,365 patients, with 712 of these patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) while 653 had received mTORi. Our meta-analysis revealed that patients that received mTORi-based immunosuppression had superior recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 1 year and 3 years with a hazard ratio of 2.02 and 1.36, respectively. Meta-analysis also showed that within the first 3 years after LT for HCC, patients receiving CNIs-based immunosuppression have a higher recurrence than those receiving mTORi-based immunosuppression. Our meta-analysis revealed that recipients of mTORi-based immunosuppression had a superior OS at 1 year and 3 years. mTORi-based immunosuppression is associated with decreased early recurrence and improved RFS and overall survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.