ArticleHepatology forum2023
Evaluation of the effectiveness of drug-eluting transarterial chemoebolization in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Hepatology forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Taiwan liver cancer association management consensus guidelines for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2025Guideline
- Pooled it
- Radiomics Using CT Images for Preoperative Prediction of Tumor Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Two-Center Study.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Tumor calcification and sustained complete response after chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: Two case reports and review of literature.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Sultan's Score: A Novel Predictive Score to Predict Complete Response Following Drug-Eluting Bead Chemoembolization.Cureus · 2025Article
- Complete contrast staining of hepatocellular carcinoma during drug-eluting bead chemoembolization predicts a favorable response.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) therapy is currently considered as first option therapy in the intermediate stage HCC. The purpose of our study is to assess the efficacy and prognostic factors related to the DEB- TACE therapy. Materials and Methods: The data from 133 patients with unresecetable HCC who were treated with DEB-TACE and followed between January 2011-March 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. To assess the efficacy of therapy, control imagings were performed at 30 Results: According to the Barcelona staging system, 16 patients (13%) were in the early stage, 58 patients (48%) were in the intermediate stage and 48 patients (39%) were in the advanced stage. There were complete response (CR) in 20 patients (17%), partial response (PR) in 36 patients (32%), stable disease (SD) in 24 patients (21%) and progressed disease (PD) in 35 (30%) patients. Median follow-up time was 14 months (range 1-77 months). Median PFS and OS were 4 months and 11 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, posttreatment AFP ≥400 ng/ml was found to be an independent prognostic factor on both PFS and OS. Child-Pugh classification and tumor size >7 cm were independent prognostic factors on OS. Conclusion: DEB-TACE is effective and a tolerable treatment method for unresectable HCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.