ReviewJournal of pediatric neuropsychology2023
Best Practices and Methodological Strategies for Addressing Generalizability in Neuropsychological Assessment.
Review in Journal of pediatric neuropsychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Canadian multi-ethnic research on aging (CAMERA) study: Design, participant characteristics, and preliminary findings.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Observational
- Validity of gold-standard clinical outcome assessments in U.S. Latinx-Hispanic participants enrolled in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: A literature review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
- Bioethical and critical consciousness in clinical translational neuroscience.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Are There Race-Based Differences in Neuropsychological Test Performance and Psychological Symptom Endorsement Among Adults Diagnosed With ADHD?Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Rehabilitation Oculomotor Screening Evaluation (ROSE)-A Proof-of-Principle Study for Acquired Brain Injuries.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Performance of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in Oncopediatric Patients in an Oncology Unit in Cali, Colombia: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Cognitive dysfunction in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: current knowledge and future directions.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generalizability considerations are widely discussed and a core foundation for understanding when and why treatment effects will replicate across sample demographics. However, guidelines on assessing and reporting generalizability-related factors differ across fields and are inconsistently applied. This paper synthesizes obstacles and best practices to apply recent work on measurement and sample diversity. We present a brief history of how knowledge in psychology has been constructed, with implications for who has been historically prioritized in research. We then review how generalizability remains a contemporary threat to neuropsychological assessment and outline best practices for researchers and clinical neuropsychologists. In doing so, we provide concrete tools to evaluate whether a given assessment is generalizable across populations and assist researchers in effectively testing and reporting treatment differences across sample demographics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.