ArticleiScience2023
Controlling the trajectory of a moving object substantially shortens the latency of motor responses to visual stimuli.
Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motor related potential amplitude and latency shifts with repetitive task execution as an indication of motor adaptation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- It's not all in your feet: Improving penalty kick performance with human-avatar interaction and machine learning.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor responses to visual stimuli have shorter latencies for controlling than for initiating movement. The shorter latencies observed for movement control are notably believed to reflect the involvement of forward models when controlling moving limbs. We assessed whether controlling a moving limb is a "requisite" to observe shortened response latencies. The latency of button-press responses to a visual stimulus was compared between conditions involving or not involving the control of a moving object, but never involving any actual control of a body segment. When the motor response controlled a moving object, response latencies were significantly shorter and less variable, probably reflecting a faster sensorimotor processing (as assessed fitting a LATER model to our data). These results suggest that when the task at hand entails a control component, the sensorimotor processing of visual information is hastened, and this even if the task does not require to actually control a moving limb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.