Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37250763›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Quality Improvement with Outcome Data in Integrated Obstetric Care Networks: Evaluating Collaboration and Learning Across Organizational Boundaries with an Action Research Approach.

Anne Louise Depla, Anna W Kersten, Marije Lamain-de Ruiter, Marielle Jambroes, Arie Franx, Inge M Evers, Bettine Pluut, Mireille N Bekker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne Louise DeplaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4502-2812
Anna W KerstenDepartment of Public Health, Julius Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marije Lamain-de RuiterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5616-5686
Marielle JambroesDepartment of Public Health, Julius Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-6221
Arie FranxDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC Sophia, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8801-5546
Inge M EversDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2323-2889
Bettine PluutErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7984-8279
Mireille N BekkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7372-4291

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROM and PREM) are used to guide individual care and quality improvement (QI). QI with patient-reported data is preferably organized around patients, which is challenging across organisations. We aimed to investigate network-broad learning for QI with outcome data. Methods: In three obstetric care networks using individual-level PROM/PREM, a learning strategy for cyclic QI based on aggregated outcome data was developed, implemented and evaluated. The strategy included clinical, patient-reported, and professional-reported data; together translated into cases for interprofessional discussion. This study's data generation (including focus groups, surveys, observations) and analysis were guided by a theoretical model for network collaboration. Results: The learning sessions identified opportunities and actions to improve quality and continuity of perinatal care. Professionals valued the data (especially patient-reported) combined with in-dept interprofessional discussion. Main challenges were professionals' time constraints, data infrastructure, and embedding improvement actions. Network-readiness for QI depended on trustful collaboration through connectivity and consensual leadership. Joint QI required information exchange and support including time and resources. Conclusions: Current fragmented healthcare organization poses barriers for network-broad QI with outcome data, but also offers opportunities for learning strategies. Furthermore, joint learning could improve collaboration to catalyse the journey towards integrated, value-based care.

Indexed as

collaborationintegrated careinterprofessional learningpatient-reported outcome measuresperinatal carevalue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID37250763
PMCPMC10215997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.