Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37250705›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Facing the infinity: tackling large samples of challenging Chironomidae (Diptera) with an integrative approach.

Caroline Chimeno, Björn Rulik, Alessandro Manfrin, Gregor Kalinkat, Franz Hölker, Viktor Baranov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The first record ofComparative cytogenetics · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caroline ChimenoBavarian State Collection of Zoology (SNSB-ZSM), Munich, Germany.
Björn RulikZoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2808-9305
Alessandro ManfrinInstitute for Environmental Sciences, iES Landau, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Landau, Germany.
Gregor KalinkatLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3529-5681
Franz HölkerLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Berlin, Germany.
Viktor BaranovEstación Biológica de Doñana-CSIC/Doñana Biological Station-CSIC, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1893-3215

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Integrative taxonomy is becoming ever more significant in biodiversity research as scientists are tackling increasingly taxonomically challenging groups. Implementing a combined approach not only guarantees more accurate species identification, but also helps overcome limitations that each method presents when applied on its own. In this study, we present one application of integrative taxonomy for the highly abundant and particularly diverse fly taxon Chironomidae (Diptera). Although non-biting midges are key organisms in merolimnic systems, they are often cast aside in ecological surveys because they are very challenging to identify and extremely abundant. Methods: Here, we demonstrate one way of applying integrative methods to tackle this highly diverse taxon. We present a three-level subsampling method to drastically reduce the workload of bulk sample processing, then apply morphological and molecular identification methods in parallel to evaluate species diversity and to examine inconsistencies across methods. Results: Our results suggest that using our subsampling approach, identifying less than 10% of a sample's contents can reliably detect >90% of its diversity. However, despite reducing the processing workload drastically, the performance of our taxonomist was affected by mistakes, caused by large amounts of material. We conducted misidentifications for 9% of vouchers, which may not have been recovered had we not applied a second identification method. On the other hand, we were able to provide species information in cases where molecular methods could not, which was the case for 14% of vouchers. Therefore, we conclude that when wanting to implement non-biting midges into ecological frameworks, it is imperative to use an integrative approach.

Indexed as

ChironomidaeAnimalsBiodiversityDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicBiodiversityBulk sample processingChironomidaeDNA barcodingFreshwaterIntegrative taxonomyMegadiverseMolecular species identificationMorphological species identificationNon biting midges

Identifiers

PMID37250705
PMCPMC10211366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.