ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Positive- vs. negative-pressure extubation technique: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of individualized PEEP titrated by EIT on postoperative atelectasis in children undergoing laparoscopy: A randomized controlled trial.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Trial
- Positive-Pressure Extubation Improves Early Oxygenation but Not Desaturation After Cesarean Delivery Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Treatment of pneumothorax and bronchopleural fistula by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a neonate: a case report.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This review aimed to summarize the recent literature on positive-pressure extubation. Design: A scoping review was conducted under the framework of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data sources: Web of Science, PubMed, Ovid, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Wan Fang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and China Biology Medicine databases were searched for studies on adults and children. Study selection: All articles describing the use of positive-pressure extubation were considered eligible for inclusion. The exclusion criteria were articles not available in English or Chinese, and those without full text available. Data extraction and synthesis: The database searches identified 8,381 articles, 15 of which could be included in this review, with an aggregated patient number of 1,544. Vital signs, including mean arterial pressure, heart rate, R-R interval, and SpO Results: The majority of these studies reported that the positive-pressure extubation technique can maintain stable vital signs and blood gas analysis indices as well as prevent complications during the peri-extubation period. Conclusions: The positive-pressure extubation technique has a safety performance similar to that of the traditional negative-pressure extubation technique and may lead to better clinical outcomes, including stable vital signs, arterial blood gas analysis, and a lower incidence of respiratory complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.