ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2023
A descriptive analysis of primary care providers' interest in clinical pharmacy services.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinician Satisfaction With Pharmacogenomics Clinical Services at a Multistate Health System.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- A Pharmacist Consultant Service for Deprescribing Opioids and Benzodiazepines in Older Adults: A Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Exploring the experience of managers, employees, and pharmacists in clinical pharmacy in primary care using the SEIPS model: A focus group study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Building primary care providers' confidence in deprescribing opioids and benzodiazepines in older adults.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Various clinical pharmacy services exist to improve the health outcomes of patients. However, there are numerous barriers to their implementation and execution, especially in outpatient settings. As pharmacists design and implement clinical pharmacy services in outpatient settings, they often do not consider the needs of providers until after service development. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess primary care providers' (PCPs') perceptions of clinical pharmacy services and their clinical pharmacy support needs. Methods: A web-based survey was distributed via email to PCPs across North Carolina (NC). Survey dissemination was completed in two phases. Data analysis consisted of mixed methods - quantitative and qualitative. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographic differences within each phase as well as the ranking of medication classes/disease states by providers. Qualitative data analysis through inductive coding was done to assess provider perceptions of clinical pharmacy services. Results: The response rate of the survey was 19.7%. Providers with previous experience with a clinical pharmacist rated overall services as positive. 62.9% of PCPs ( Conclusions: The results from this study demonstrated that clinical pharmacy services are valued by PCPs. They also highlighted how pharmacists can best contribute to collaborative care in outpatient settings. As pharmacists, we should aim to implement the clinical pharmacy services that PCPs would value most.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.