ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Pediatric Trauma and Posttraumatic Symptom Screening at Well-child Visits.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- It's okay to not be okay.Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- The effect of adverse childhood experience training, screening, and response in primary care: a systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Review
- Advocating for Our Children: An Initiative Utilizing Verbal and Video Education to Increase Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire Form Response Rate.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
- Constantly Connected: What Healthcare Providers Need to Know About Vicarious Trauma in an Evolving Digitally Connected Global Community.Missouri medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), including abuse or neglect, parental substance abuse, mental illness, or separation, are public health crises that require identification and response. We aimed to increase annual rates of trauma screening during well-child visits from 0% to 70%, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom screening for children with identified trauma from 0% to 30%, and connection to behavioral health for children with symptoms from 0% to 60%. Methods: Our interdisciplinary behavioral and medical health team implemented 3 plan-do-study-act cycles to improve screening and response to pediatric traumatic experiences. Automated reports and chart reviews measured progress toward goals as we changed screening methods and provider training. Results: During plan-do-study-act cycle 1, a chart review of patients with positive trauma screenings identified various trauma types. During cycle 2, a comparison of screening methods demonstrated that written screening identified trauma among more children than verbal screening (8.3% versus 1.7%). During cycle 3, practices completed trauma screenings at 25,287 (89.8%) well-child visits. Among screenings, 2,441 (9.7%) identified trauma. The abbreviated Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index was conducted at 907 (37.2%) encounters and identified 520 children (57.3%) with PTSD symptoms. Among a sample of 250, 26.4% were referred to behavioral health, 43.2% were already connected, and 30.4% had no connection. Conclusions: It is feasible to screen and respond to trauma during well-child visits. Screening method and training implementation changes can improve screening and response to pediatric trauma and PTSD. Further work is needed to increase rates of PTSD symptomology screening and connection to behavioral health.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.