ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
The effect of azoospermia factor microdeletions on intracytoplasmic sperm injection results in azoospermia patients.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking barriers in male infertility: the power of artificial intelligence-driven solutions.Frontiers in urology · 2026Review
- Assisted reproduction outcome of the cases with male factor infertility: A retrospective chart review of 1913 ICSI cycles along 10 years.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Emerging trends in sperm selection: enhancing success rates in assisted reproduction.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Review
- Detection of AZF microdeletions and analysis of reproductive hormonal profiles in Hainan men undergoing assisted reproductive technology.BMC urology · 2024Article
- Y chromosome microdeletions in Chinese men with infertility: prevalence, phenotypes, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background &Objective: Y chromosome abnormalities are common in male patients with severe oligo-azoospermia. In studies with karyotype analysis and cytogenetic methods, the importance of the Y chromosome in spermatogenesis has been well understood. Deletions in the azoospermia factor (AZF) localized at the distal end of the Y chromosome adversely affect the spermatogenesis process. Our objective was to determine the frequency of AZF microdeletion in azoospermia patients who underwent microTESE. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 806 azoospermic men attending the In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Center for infertility treatment between 2010 and 2022 were included. AZF deletion screening was conducted in all patients included in the study. Azoospermic patients with and without Y microdeletion were matched with the female's age, cause of infertility, number of oocytes retrieved and number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes produced and compared. The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR). Pregnancy rate (PR) and clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) were secondary outcomes. Results: We detected Y microdeletion in 55 (6.82%) of 806 infertile azoospermic men and 35 of them included in the study. Although the required gonadotropin dose and the total number of retrieved oocytes were similar, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates were found to be significantly lower in the microdeletion patient group (21.6% vs. 43%, p<0.05; and 18.9% vs. 36%, p<0.05, respectively). Conclusions: Poor sperm quality in AZF microdeletion patients complicates the selection of appropriate sperm for ICSI. Therefore, it leads to a decrease in embryonic development, fertilization and pregnancy results. In order to select the best sperm for the use in ICSI procedure in this patient population, intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) method can be preferred to improve the cycle outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.