ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
Effectiveness of modified Valsalva maneuver by using wide bore syringe for emergency treatment of supraventricular tachycardias: Findings from Pakistan.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of modified versus standard Valsalva maneuvers on clinical outcomes and satisfaction of children with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: randomized control trial.BMC pediatrics · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of the modified Valsalva maneuver vs the standard Valsalva maneuver for the conversion of supraventricular tachycardia to normal sinus rhythm in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Use and effectiveness of the Valsalva maneuver for supraventricular tachycardia in prehospital emergency care: a retrospective cohort study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Pursuit of Optimal Vagal Maneuvers in Stable Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Network Meta-Analysis.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The Valsalva maneuver (VM) is the most effective measure that can be carried out to treat supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Our objective was to compare the efficacy of postural modified VM with 20 ml syringe to standard VM for the emergency treatment of SVT. Methods: This randomized control trial study was conducted at the Accident and Emergency Department, Pakistan ordinance factories hospital, Wah Cantt from July 2019 to September 2020. In the standard Valsalva group, fifty patients were placed at an angle of 45 with continuous monitoring of vitals and electrocardiogram. Patients blew into a 20ml syringe to generate 40 mmHg pressure for 15 seconds and remained in the same position for 45 seconds before a reassessment of cardiac rhythm at one-minute and three-minute intervals. In the modified Valsalva group same procedure was repeated with the other fifty patients, but immediately at the end of the strain, they were laid flat with their legs raised to 45° for 15 seconds. Participants returned to semi-recumbent position and cardiac rhythm was reassessed after 45 seconds and then at one and three minutes. Results: In the standard Valsalva maneuver (SVM)20.0% of participants versus 58% of participants in the modified Valsalva maneuvers group(MVM) reverted to sinus rhythm at one min (odds ratio or 5.52, 95% CI 2.26-13.47; p<0.001) and time of stay in the emergency room was (odds ratio or 2.39, 95% CI 1.45- 3.93; p<0.0001). Conclusion: Modified Valsalva by using a wide-bore syringe is more effective method than standard Valsalva in terminating SVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.