ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
Clinical application of ultrasound-guided Core Needle Biopsy Histology and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Cervical Lymph Nodes.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of conventional ultrasonography and elastography ultrasound in detecting malignant cervical lymph nodes.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Optimization strategies for ultrasound zoning of cervical lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: a precision medicine approach.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Comment on "Cervical Lymphadenopathies: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis of Patients Undergoing Excisional Biopsy".Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the difference of application of core needle biopsy histology and fine needle aspiration cytology in cervical lymphadenopathy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made on 80 patients with cervical lymphadenopathy admitted to Baoding No.1 Central Hospital from to October 2018 to February 2020, and they were randomly divided into two groups: core needle group and fine needle group. Patients in the core needle group were given core needle biopsy histology, while those in the fine needle group were given fine needle aspiration cytology, and the puncture results and surgical complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The accuracy rates of the core needle group and the fine needle group in the diagnosis of malignant cervical lymph nodes were 95.83% and 72.22% respectively, with a statistically significant difference ( Conclusions: No significant difference was observed between core needle biopsy histology and fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosing cervical lymphadenopathy, but the former has a high complication rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.