ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023
Efficacy of flupirtine for postoperative pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Signals from randomized clinical trials predicting hepatotoxicity of flupirtine: systematic review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- An Emerging Paradigm for Safer and Faster Recovery: A Narrative Review on Opioid Sparing Anesthesia in Surgery.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Flupirtine has been used for various chronic pain conditions, but its utility in the perioperative period as an analgesic is still inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of flupirtine for postoperative pain. Methods: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were explored for the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared flupirtine with other analgesic/placebo for perioperative pain in adult patients undergoing surgery. The standardised mean difference (SMD) of pain scores, the need for rescue analgesia and all adverse effects were assessed. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane's Q statistic test and I Results: A total of 13 RCTs (including 1,014 patients) that evaluated the use of flupirtine for postoperative pain were included in the study. The pooled SMD of postoperative pain scores revealed that flupirtine and other analgesics were comparable at 0, 6, 12 and 24 hours ( Conclusion: The current evidence suggests that perioperative flupirtine was not superior to other most commonly used analgesics and placebo for the treatment of postoperative pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.