Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37250484›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2023

MHC Class I Masking to Prevent AMR in a Porcine Kidney Transplantation Model in Alloimmunized Recipients.

Delphine Kervella, Julien Branchereau, Thomas Prudhomme, Véronique Nerrière-Daguin, Karine Renaudin, David Minault, Jérémy Hervouet, Bernard Martinet, Sarah Bruneau, Stéphanie Le Bas-Bernardet and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Delphine KervellaCenter for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, INSERM, Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, UMR 1064, Institut Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, Nantes, France.
Julien BranchereauCenter for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, INSERM, Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, UMR 1064, Institut Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, Nantes, France.
Thomas PrudhommeCenter for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, INSERM, Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, UMR 1064, Institut Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, Nantes, France.
Véronique Nerrière-DaguinCenter for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, INSERM, Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, UMR 1064, Institut Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, Nantes, France.
Karine RenaudinService d'anatomopathologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, Nantes Université, Nantes, France.
David MinaultCenter for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, INSERM, Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, UMR 1064, Institut Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, Nantes, France.
Jérémy HervouetCenter for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, INSERM, Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, UMR 1064, Institut Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, Nantes, France.
Bernard MartinetCenter for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, INSERM, Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, UMR 1064, Institut Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, Nantes, France.
Sarah BruneauCenter for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, INSERM, Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, UMR 1064, Institut Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, Nantes, France.
Stéphanie Le Bas-BernardetCenter for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, INSERM, Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, UMR 1064, Institut Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, Nantes, France.
Gilles BlanchoCenter for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, INSERM, Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, UMR 1064, Institut Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, Nantes, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presensitized patients awaiting a kidney transplant have a lower graft survival and a longer waiting time because of the limited number of potential donors and the higher risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), particularly in the early posttransplant period, because of preformed donor-specific antibodies binding major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules expressed by the graft endothelium followed by the activation of the complement. Advances in kidney preservation techniques allow the development of ex vivo treatment of transplants. We hypothesized that masking MHC ex vivo before transplantation could help to prevent early AMR in presensitized recipients. We evaluated a strategy of MHC I masking by an antibody during ex vivo organ perfusion in a porcine model of kidney transplantation in alloimmunized recipients. Methods: Through the in vitro calcein-release assay and flow cytometry, we evaluated the protective effect of a monoclonal anti-swine leukocyte antigen class I antibody (clone JM1E3) against alloreactive IgG complement-dependent cytotoxicity toward donor endothelial cells. Kidneys perfused ex vivo with JM1E3 during hypothermic machine perfusion were transplanted to alloimmunized recipients. Results: In vitro incubation of endothelial cells with JM1E3 decreased alloreactive IgG cytotoxicity (mean complement-dependent cytotoxicity index [% of control condition] with 1 µg/mL 74.13% ± 35.26 [calcein assay] and 66.88% ± 33.46 [cytometry]), with high interindividual variability. After transplantation, acute AMR occurred in all recipients on day 1, with signs of complement activation (C5b-9 staining) as soon as 1 h after transplantation, despite effective JM1E3 binding on graft endothelium. Conclusions: Despite a partial protective effect of swine leukocyte antigen I masking with JM1E3 in vitro, ex vivo perfusion of the kidney with JM1E3 before transplantation was not sufficient alone at preventing or delaying AMR in highly sensitized recipients.

Identifiers

PMID37250484
PMCPMC10219698
OpenAlexW4378468985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.