ArticleFrontiers in sociology2023
Transformation of the concepts and practice of total pain and total care: 30 years of Danish hospices.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Competing institutional logics in surgical training: a qualitative study of coping strategies in China's dual-track system.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Observational
- Addressing the concept of total pain in palliative care: A postcolonial South African hospice view.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Article
- Cybernetic Principles in Psychophysiology: Their Significance and Conclusions for Palliative Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of total pain endeavors to encompass central aspects of suffering in relation to severe disease, death and dying. Dame Cicely Saunders introduced the concept in the early 1960s in relation to care for the terminally ill and dying patients with cancer. An examination of Danish palliative care, particularly Danish hospice care, indicates that total pain continues to be a relevant concept today. To further explore the current relevance of total pain the study examines its underlying ontology, epistemology and methodology. The study also addresses how the understanding and practice of total pain theory has developed throughout its history, in addition to how the understanding of concepts and practices is constantly being negotiated, shaped and transformed in relation to changes in society and by individuals, groups and organizations. The first of 21 hospices in Denmark opened in 1992 and they represent a case in point for exploring the transformation of total pain and total care since then. The empirical data, which are based on materials relevant to the history of the hospice movement and practice in Denmark, include national policy documents, local yearbooks, mapping, research, documentation of practice, interviews and on-going dialogue with management and staff at Danish hospices over the last 25 years. The study, which takes an abductive analytical approach, draws on my own experiences and empirical data, in addition to the empirical and theoretical research of others but also gains inspiration from a theoretical institutional logic perspective. Research shows that there are three main co-existing and interrelated institutional logics in the history of Danish hospices: care, medicine and governance. Based on inspiration from sociological and philosophical palliative care research and data on the development of Danish hospices, this study demonstrates how the concepts and practices of total pain and total care have been transformed in the compromises made due to the co-existence of these competing logics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.