ArticleAtherosclerosis plus2023
Long term aortic arch plaque progression in older adults.
Article in Atherosclerosis plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: The presence of aortic arch plaques (AAP) is significantly associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Few studies have examined the incidence of AAP progression and factors which may contribute to it using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The objective of this study was to utilize sequential imaging of the aortic arch using TTE to examine the rate of AAP progression and its risk factors in a cohort of older adults. Methods: Participants enrolled in both the Cardiovascular Abnormalities and Brain Lesion study (years 2005-2010) and the Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Ischemic Stroke study (2014-2019) who underwent TTE with assessment of aortic arch plaques at both time points represent the study cohort. Results: 300 participants were included in the study. Mean age was 67.8 ± 7.5 years at baseline, and 76.7 ± 6.8 years at follow-up; 197 (65.7%) were women. At baseline, 87 (29%) had no significant AAP, 182 (60.7%) had evidence of small AAP (2.0-3.9 mm) and 31 (10.3%) had evidence of large (≥4 mm) AAP. At the time of follow-up assessment, 157 (52.3%) of participants exhibited progression of AAP with 70 (23.3%) having mild progression and 87 (29%) having severe progression. There were no significant demographic or clinical predictors of AAP progression except baseline plaque thickness itself which was significantly lower in the group with AAP progression. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a high prevalence of AAP on TTE exam in a population-based cohort of older adults with a high incidence of AAP progression. TTE is a useful test for baseline and follow up imaging of AAP, even in subjects with no or little AAP at baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.