ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Visual reading for [
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual interpretation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Role ofAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Neuroimaging of Alzheimer's Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Visual reading for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- The Taiwan-ADNI workflow toward integrating plasma p-tau217 into prediction models for the risk of Alzheimer's disease and tau burden.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Improved interpretation ofiScience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tau-targeted positron emission tomography (tau-PET) is a potential tool for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to clarify the distribution of tau deposition. In addition to the quantitative analysis of tau-PET scans, visual reading supports the assessment of tau loading for clinical diagnosis. This study aimed to propose a method for visually interpreting tau-PET using the [ Materials and methods: A total number of 46 individuals with 12 cognitively unimpaired subjects (CU), 20 AD patients with mild cognitive impairment (AD-MCI), and 14 AD with dementia (AD-D) patients with both [ Results: The result indicates the average global visual scores were 0 ± 0 in the CU group, 3.43 ± 3.35 in the AD-MCI group, and 6.31 ± 2.97 in the AD-D group ( Conclusion: The visual reading method generated a visual score of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.