Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37250163›Full record

ReviewActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2023

Click chemistry and drug delivery: A bird's-eye view.

Shameer M Kondengadan, Shubham Bansal, Ce Yang, Dongning Liu, Zach Fultz, Binghe Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shameer M KondengadanDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Shubham BansalDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Ce YangDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Dongning LiuDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Zach FultzDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Binghe WangDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Click chemistry has been proven to be very useful in drug delivery. Due to the availability of a large number of click reactions with a various characteristics, selection of appropriate chemistry for a given application is often not a trivial task. This review is written for pharmaceutical researchers who are interested in click chemistry applications and yet may not be click chemistry experts. For this, the review gives an overview of available click reactions organized by application types. Further, the general understanding of click reactions being fast and high yielding sometimes overshadows the need to analyze reaction kinetics in assessing suitability of a given reaction for certain applications. For this, we highlight the need to analyze the relationship among reaction kinetics, concentration effects, and reaction time scales, knowing that lack of such analysis could easily lead to failures. Further, possible issues such as chemical stability with various click reagents are also discussed to aid experimental designs. Recent examples and extensive references are also provided to aid in-depth understanding of technical details. We hope this review will help those interested in using click chemistry in drug delivery to select the appropriate reactions/reagents and minimize the number of pitfalls.

Indexed as

Antibody–drug conjugatesBioorthogonal chemistryBond-breaking reactionGasotransmittersPROTAC

Identifiers

PMID37250163
PMCPMC10213991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.