Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37250110›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2023

EpiCompare: R package for the comparison and quality control of epigenomic peak files.

Sera Choi, Brian M Schilder, Leyla Abbasova, Alan E Murphy, Nathan G Skene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sera ChoiDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5077-1984
Brian M SchilderDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5949-2191
Leyla AbbasovaCentre for Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Alan E MurphyDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2487-8753
Nathan G SkeneDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T04327X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summary: EpiCompare combines a variety of downstream analysis tools to compare, quality control and benchmark different epigenomic datasets. The package requires minimal input from users, can be run with just one line of code and provides all results of the analysis in a single interactive HTML report. EpiCompare thus enables downstream analysis of multiple epigenomic datasets in a simple, effective and user-friendly manner. Availability and implementation: EpiCompare is available on Bioconductor (≥ v3.15): https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/EpiCompare.html; all source code is publicly available via GitHub: https://github.com/neurogenomics/EpiCompare; documentation website https://neurogenomics.github.io/EpiCompare; and EpiCompare DockerHub repository: https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/neurogenomicslab/epicompare.

Identifiers

PMID37250110
PMCPMC10209526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.