ArticleNeurophotonics2023
Test-retest reliability of functional near-infrared spectroscopy during a finger-tapping and postural task in healthy older adults.
Article in Neurophotonics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neural correlates of weight-shift training in older adults: a randomized controlled study.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Evaluating the reliability of functional near-infrared spectroscopy data in the context of a reasoning paradigm.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Treatment-related Cognitive Impairment, Neurovascular Coupling, and Iron Levels in Women with Ovarian Cancer.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Reliability of Behavioral and fNIRS Neural Responses: Assessments During Posture-Inhibitory Control Dual Tasking.NeuroSci · 2026Article
- Optimizing short-channel regression in fNIRS: an empirical evaluation with ecological audiovisual stimuli.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Group-level test-retest reliability assessment using systemic physiology augmented functional near-infrared spectroscopy during a passive-listening task.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- How to design real-world functional near-infrared spectroscopy studies: a primer.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Exploring the relationship between prefrontal cortex activation, standing balance, and fatigue in people post-stroke: A fNIRS study.NeuroRehabilitation · 2025Article
- Reliability of brain metrics derived from a Time-Domain Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy System.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Frontal and parietal cortices activation during walking is repeatable in older adults based on fNIRS.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Age-related differences of subjective visual vertical perception in adults-a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
- Age-related cerebral changes during different n-back tasks: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
- Mobile fNIRS for exploring inter-brain synchrony across generations and time.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is increasingly employed in studies requiring repeated measurements, yet test-retest reliability is largely unknown. Aim: To investigate test-retest reliability during a postural and a finger-tapping task with and without cap-removal. Approach: Twenty healthy older adults performed a postural and a finger-tapping task. The tasks were repeated twice in one session and once the next day. A portable fNIRS system measured cortical hemodynamics ( Results: Test-retest reliability without cap-removal was excellent for the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the premotor cortex (PMC) and the somatosensory cortex (SSC) (intraclass correlation coefficient Conclusions: Test-retest reliability of fNIRS measurements during two separate motor tasks in healthy older adults was fair to excellent when the cap remained in place. However, removing the fNIRS cap between measurements compromised reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.