ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023
An improved Yolov5s based on transformer backbone network for detection and classification of bronchoalveolar lavage cells.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Disease-Aware Dual-Stage Framework for Chest X-ray Report Generation.Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2026Article
- A Performance Comparison of Different YOLOv7 Networks for High-Accuracy Cell Classification in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Utilising the Adam Optimiser and Label Smoothing.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- PW-BALFC, a clinical dataset for detection and instance segmentation of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cell.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Bringing AI to Clinicians: Simplifying Pleural Effusion Cytology Diagnosis with User-Friendly Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological tissue information of the lung, such as cells and proteins, can be obtained from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), through which it can be used as a complement to lung biopsy pathology. BALF cells can be confused with each other due to the similarity of their characteristics and differences in the way sections are handled or viewed. This poses a great challenge for cell detection. In this paper, An Improved Yolov5s Based on Transformer Backbone Network for Detection and Classification of BALF Cells is proposed, focusing on the detection of four types of cells in BALF: macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils and eosinophils. The network is mainly based on the Yolov5s network and uses Swin Transformer V2 technology in the backbone network to improve cell detection accuracy by obtaining global information; the C3Ghost module (a variant of the Convolutional Neural Network architecture) is used in the neck network to reduce the number of parameters during feature channel fusion and to improve feature expression performance. In addition, embedding intersection over union Loss (EIoU_Loss) was used as a bounding box regression loss function to speed up the bounding box regression rate, resulting in higher accuracy of the algorithm. The experiments showed that our model could achieve mAP of 81.29% and Recall of 80.47%. Compared to the original Yolov5s, the mAP has improved by 3.3% and Recall by 3.67%. We also compared it with Yolov7 and the newly launched Yolov8s. mAP improved by 0.02% and 2.36% over Yolov7 and Yolov8s respectively, while the FPS of our model was higher than both of them, achieving a balance of efficiency and accuracy, further demonstrating the superiority of our model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.