ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2023
A synthetic fingerprint solution and its importance in DNA transfer, persistence and recovery studies.
Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interpol review of fingermark composition and visualization 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- A swab and wetting agent combination investigation for enhanced touch DNA recovery: A step towards standardisation.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- A review of artificial sebum formulations, their compositions, uses and physicochemical characteristics.International journal of cosmetic science · 2025Review
- Comparison of swabbing and cutting-out DNA collection methods from cotton, paper, and cardboard surfaces.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2024Article
- Impact of swabbing solutions on the recovery of biological material from non-porous surfaces.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A review of the literature on DNA transfer and persistence highlights many difficulties that are encountered when conducting research of this nature. One of the main problems highlighted repeatedly in the literature is the prevalence of inherent uncontrolled variation that accompany these studies, and in turn, the results obtained. This work aims to decrease the amount of intrinsic variability associated with DNA transfer and persistence experiments using a realistic proxy solution which is adaptable, of known composition, reproducible, and capable of being standardised. This proxy is composed of three parts: a synthetic fingerprint solution, cellular DNA, and cell free DNA. In this proof-of-concept study the proxy was tested with a small-scale DNA transfer and recovery experiment and the data obtained suggests that the use of a solution that mimics real fingerprint secretions, over an alternative (such as buffer or a body fluid), is important when working with non-donor provided trace DNA samples. This is because the DNA deposit solution likely impacts the transfer of DNA from fingers/hands to a surface as well as the ability to recover the biological material once deposited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.