Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37249946›Full record

ArticleInternational IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering2023

The Design of Brainstem Interfaces: Characterisation of Physiological Artefacts and Implications for Closed-loop Algorithms.

Alceste Deli, Robert Toth, Mayela Zamora, Amir P Divanbeighi Zand, Alexander L Green, Timothy Denison

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alceste DeliDepartment of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Robert TothMRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TH, UK.
Mayela ZamoraInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
Amir P Divanbeighi ZandDepartment of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Alexander L GreenDepartment of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Timothy DenisonMRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TH, UK.
University of Oxford · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_18059Medical Research Council MC_UU_00003/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical neuromodulation through implantable devices allows for stimulation delivery to subcortical regions, crucial for symptom control in many debilitating neurological conditions. Novel closed-loop algorithms deliver therapy tailor-made to endogenous physiological activity, however rely on precise sensing of signals such as subcortical oscillations. The frequency of such intrinsic activity can vary depending on subcortical target nucleus, while factors such as regional anatomy may also contribute to variability in sensing signals. While artefact parameters have been explored in more 'standard' and commonly used targets (such as the basal ganglia, which are implanted in movement disorders), characterisation in novel candidate nuclei is still under investigation. One such important area is the brainstem, which contains nuclei crucial for arousal and autonomic regulation. The brainstem provides additional implantation targets for treatment indications in disorders of consciousness and sleep, yet poses distinct anatomical challenges compared to central subcortical targets. Here we investigate the region-specific artefacts encountered during activity and rest while streaming data from brainstem implants with a cranially-mounted device in two patients. Such artefacts result from this complex anatomical environment and its interactions with physiological parameters such as head movement and cardiac functions. The implications of the micromotion-induced artefacts, and potential mitigation, are then considered for future closed-loop stimulation methods.

Indexed as

Brainstem NeuromodulationDeep Brain StimulationMicromotion Artefacts

Identifiers

PMID37249946
PMCPMC7614576
OpenAlexW4377089504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.