Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37249942›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors reports2023

Mentalization in young patients undergoing opioid agonist treatment: Implications for clinical management.

Livia Pischiutta, Marco Garzitto, Giuliano Zamparutti, Enrico Moratti, Umberto Albert, Marco Colizzi, Matteo Balestrieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Livia PischiuttaUnit of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Marco GarzittoUnit of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Giuliano ZamparuttiDrug Addiction Service, Department of Addiction, University Health Integrated Agency, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Enrico MorattiDrug Addiction Service, Department of Addiction, University Health Integrated Agency, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Umberto AlbertDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy.
Marco ColizziUnit of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Matteo BalestrieriUnit of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mentalization is the ability to use internal mental states to manage and understand one's own and others' behavior. Inefficient mentalization has been associated to poor neuropsychological outcomes, including substance use disorder (SUD) and addiction. However, studies primarily investigating mentalization in SUD are lacking. Methods: Using the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ), the Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation, version 2.1 (MATE-IT-2.1), and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, 7th edition (MINI-7), an outpatient assessment investigated inefficient mentalization (i.e., 'hypo-mentalization' or 'uncertainty': concrete thinking with poor attribution of mental states; 'hyper-mentalization' or 'certainty': rigid and biased attribution of mental states) and socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, including SUD-related symptoms and any other psychiatric comorbidity, among opioid addiction (OA) patients in Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT). Results: Thirty-seven consecutive OA patients in OAT (female, 45.9 %; age, M ± SD, 24.3 ± 3.55) were recruited. Patients' mentalization differed from normative data, in terms of higher uncertainty and lower certainty scores. Also, higher uncertainty score was found among younger patients and in those with the most severe SUD in terms of craving and need for care. Finally, lower certainty score was found in those with a more severe substance abuse, previous contacts with pediatric mental-health services, and receiving a therapeutic community support. Conclusions: OA patients with inefficient mentalization present with a higher burden in terms of SUD severity, comorbidities, psychosocial disabilities, and service use, with important public health implications. Interventions targeting mentalization may have positive repercussions in preventing SUD, mitigating its severity, and containing its healthcare and social costs.

Indexed as

MentalizationOpioid agonist treatmentReflective functioning questionnaireSubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID37249942
PMCPMC10212784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.