Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37249933›Full record

ReviewACS physical chemistry Au2023

On the Temperature Sensitivity of Electrochemical Reaction Thermodynamics.

Haley A Petersen, Emmet N Miller, Phuc H Pham, Kajal, Jaclyn L Katsirubas, Hunter J Koltunski, Oana R Luca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS physical chemistry Au, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantification of redox thermodynamics shifts within coacervates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haley A PetersenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.
Emmet N MillerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.
Phuc H PhamDepartment of Chemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.
KajalDepartment of Chemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.
Jaclyn L KatsirubasDepartment of Chemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.
Hunter J KoltunskiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.
Oana R LucaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2988-4909

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein, we report a method to estimate the thermodynamic potentials of electrochemical reactions at different temperatures. We use a two-term Taylor series approximation of thermodynamic potential as a function of temperature, and we calculate the temperature sensitivity for a family of twenty seven known half reactions. We further analyze pairs of cathode and anode half-cells to pinpoint optimal voltage matches and discuss implications of changes in temperature on overall cell voltages. Using these observations, we look forward to increased interest in temperature and idealized half-reaction pairing as experimental choices for the optimization of electrochemical processes.

Identifiers

PMID37249933
PMCPMC10214520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.