Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37249753›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2023

Biomarkers of exposure and potential harm in exclusive users of electronic cigarettes and current, former, and never smokers.

Linsey E Haswell, Nathan Gale, Elaine Brown, David Azzopardi, Michael McEwan, Jesse Thissen, Filimon Meichanetzidis, George Hardie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Microbiota-Influenced Toxicological Responses inmicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linsey E HaswellBAT (Investments) Limited, Regents Park Road, Millbrook, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK. Linsey_Haswell@bat.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5663-8834
Nathan GaleBAT (Investments) Limited, Regents Park Road, Millbrook, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
Elaine BrownBAT (Investments) Limited, Regents Park Road, Millbrook, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
David AzzopardiBAT (Investments) Limited, Regents Park Road, Millbrook, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
Michael McEwanBAT (Investments) Limited, Regents Park Road, Millbrook, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
Jesse ThissenBAT (Investments) Limited, Regents Park Road, Millbrook, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
Filimon MeichanetzidisBAT (Investments) Limited, Regents Park Road, Millbrook, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
George HardieBAT (Investments) Limited, Regents Park Road, Millbrook, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
British American Tobacco (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic cigarette (EC) aerosol emissions generally contain fewer and lower concentrations of harmful and potentially harmful constituents, compared with cigarette smoke. Further studies are needed to establish whether decreased emissions translate to reduced health risks for EC users. In a cross-sectional study, biomarkers of exposure (BoE) to certain tobacco smoke toxicants and biomarkers of potential harm (BoPH), associated with biological processes linked to the potential development of smoking-related diseases and oxidative stress, were assessed in solus Vuse ECs users and current, former, and never smokers. In total, 213 participants were enrolled, and smoking status was confirmed by urinary cotinine, exhaled carbon monoxide, and N-(2-cyanoethyl)valine levels (EC users and former smokers only). During confinement participants used their usual product (EC or cigarette) as normal and BoE and BoPHs were assessed via blood, 24-h urine, and physiological assessment. Significantly lower levels of all urinary BoE; MHBMA, HMPMA, 3-HPMA, NNN, 3-OH-B[a]P, S-PMA, NNAL (all p < 0.0001), and TNeq (p = 0.0074) were observed in EC users when compared with smokers. Moreover, significantly lower levels were observed in EC users for 3 of the 7 BoPH measured, carboxyhaemoglobin (p < 0.0001), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (p = 0.0028), and 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (p = 0.0012), when compared with smokers. As compared with smokers, solus Vuse EC users have significantly lower exposure to tobacco toxicants for the BoE, and 3 BoPH measured. These results add to the weight of evidence supporting EC as part of a tobacco harm reduction strategy.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSmokersBiomarkersBiomarkers of exposureBiomarkers of potential harmElectronic cigarettesTobacco harm reduction

Identifiers

PMID37249753
PMCPMC10412681
OpenAlexW4378745735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.