ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Ultrasound guidance in navigated liver surgery: toward deep-learning enhanced compensation of deformation and organ motion.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- DefSynUS: Real-time patient-specific intrahepatic vessel identification via deformation-aware CT-US domain adaptation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Navigated hepatic tumor resection using intraoperative ultrasound imaging.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Resolving the Ambiguity of Complete-to-Partial Point Cloud Registration for Image-Guided Liver Surgery With Patches-to-Partial Matching.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2026Article
- Boundary Constraint-Free Biomechanical Model-Based Surface Matching for Intraoperative Liver Deformation Correction.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAccuracy of image-guided liver surgery is challenged by deformation of the liver during the procedure. This study aims at improving navigation accuracy by using intraoperative deep learning segmentation and nonrigid registration of hepatic vasculature from ultrasound (US) images to compensate for changes in liver position and deformation.
methodsThis was a single-center prospective study of patients with liver metastases from any origin. Electromagnetic tracking was used to follow US and liver movement. A preoperative 3D model of the liver, including liver lesions, and hepatic and portal vasculature, was registered with the intraoperative organ position. Hepatic vasculature was segmented using a reduced 3D U-Net and registered to preoperative imaging after initial alignment followed by nonrigid registration. Accuracy was assessed as Euclidean distance between the tumor center imaged in the intraoperative US and the registered preoperative image.
resultsMedian target registration error (TRE) after initial alignment was 11.6 mm in 25 procedures and improved to 6.9 mm after nonrigid registration (p = 0.0076). The number of TREs above 10 mm halved from 16 to 8 after nonrigid registration. In 9 cases, registration was performed twice after failure of the first attempt. The first registration cycle was completed in median 11 min (8:00-18:45 min) and a second in 5 min (2:30-10:20 min).
conclusionThis novel registration workflow using automatic vascular detection and nonrigid registration allows to accurately localize liver lesions. Further automation in the workflow is required in initial alignment and classification accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37249749What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.